Luke Dringoli
Luke Dringoli
Editor, Social Networks

Turning the Tables on Brand Identity

Last month, YouTube user Normative examined remix culture arguing that such mash-ups have become a way for different social circles to interpret work. Greater than what one person can do alone, he theorizes it’s changed the rules of interaction in a digital age.
So what can a brand learn from this remix craze? At the very least, it should be aware—not to mention the implications on its identity (hint: it no longer belongs solely to the brand).

If this is embraced, will brands better relate to various niches and social groups? Can they let consumers personalize existing brand messages?

Brands surrendering control allows consumers to make content more relevant to them. Whether this means “elfing” themselves or just splicing commercials, let ’em at the turntables. It doesn’t hurt to mix things up.

  • http://brandconsultantasia.wordpress.com/2009/08/31/positioning-an-exercise-in-naive-manipulative-futility/ brandconsultants

    A great thought starter, provocative and intuitive.

    95% of products fail to become brands, despite over US$1.5 trillion spent on marketing of which about US$500 billion is spent on advertising. Advertising is important and always will be important to brand building but ‘getting your name out there’ or ‘awareness’ are too mass economy and we’re now in the customer economy.

    In the customer economy, it is about engaging communities that have interests related to your product and entering into a communication initially and a collaboration eventually with those communities. Throw out the old mass economy mass market attitude that includes carpet bombing consumers with messages.

    However, until CEOs get over the ego issue and start looking at ROI, advertising agencies will continue to make hay and who can blame them?
    http://brandconsultantasia.wordpress.com/2009/08/31/positioning-an-exercise-in-naive-manipulative-futility/